Supreme Court Rejects Hearing About Obama Citizenship

Look, let's get this straight, I'm a constitutional innocent until proven guilty, everyone deserves equal protection under the law kind of guy. I have no evidence that Barack Obama was or wasn't born in the United States and is therefore eligable to be President of the United States of America, and apparently neither does anyone else.

There are however many reasons to think we should at least explore the issue and have the Supreme Court of The United States put the issue to bed. Today the SCOTUS rejected yet another hearing.

My question today is the same as it ever was: Why, if he is indeed a citizen, has Barack Obama spent so much money squelching opposition? No one knows the real figure. Why was Justice Kagan his nominee?

What does the president have to hide in his past that he has sealed his education records? Wayne Allen Root, former Libertarian candidate for vice president, put up $1Million dollars as a challenge for those records to be released.....who couldn't use a million dollars?

If he was such a rock star at Harvard Law and edited the Harvard Law Review, why didn't he ever get an article published? "As president of the Harvard Law Review and a law professor in Chicago, Senator Barack Obama refined his legal thinking, but left a scant paper trail. His name doesn't appear on any legal scholarship."

How was Obama allowed to attend school in Indonesia as a child during a time that only citizens of Indonesian were allowed to attend public schools?

The questions are too numerous not to be answered. Like I said, the burden of proof, beyond a reasonable doubt, is on the accuser. I think there is reasonable doubt.