I think this is a major piece of the Paulian literature: he takes the what-if scenario and spells it out, from a realistic perspective of being a statistical minority in terms of legislative clout. His way of reorienting the funding conversation is nothing short of genius. Thanks for bringing this to a wider audience, Mr. Bitter.
I think this is a major piece of the Paulian literature: he takes the what-if scenario and spells it out, from a realistic perspective of being a statistical minority in terms of legislative clout. His way of reorienting the funding conversation is nothing short of genius.
ReplyDeleteThanks for bringing this to a wider audience, Mr. Bitter.